• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 5 (2025)
Volume Volume 4 (2024)
Volume Volume 3 (2023)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2022)
Volume Volume 1 (2021)
Nagy, W., Kamal, M., Sherif, R., Kheiralla, L. (2023). Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of PEEK Vs. Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns Constructed By Two Fabrication Techniques: CAD/CAM And Heat Press (In-Vitro Study). Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 3(1), 63-85. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.186598.1045
Weaam Nagy Nagy; Mostafa Hussien Kamal; Rana Mahmoud Sherif; Lamia Sayed Kheiralla. "Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of PEEK Vs. Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns Constructed By Two Fabrication Techniques: CAD/CAM And Heat Press (In-Vitro Study)". Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 3, 1, 2023, 63-85. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.186598.1045
Nagy, W., Kamal, M., Sherif, R., Kheiralla, L. (2023). 'Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of PEEK Vs. Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns Constructed By Two Fabrication Techniques: CAD/CAM And Heat Press (In-Vitro Study)', Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 3(1), pp. 63-85. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.186598.1045
Nagy, W., Kamal, M., Sherif, R., Kheiralla, L. Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of PEEK Vs. Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns Constructed By Two Fabrication Techniques: CAD/CAM And Heat Press (In-Vitro Study). Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 2023; 3(1): 63-85. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.186598.1045

Evaluation of Marginal Accuracy of PEEK Vs. Lithium Disilicate Single Crowns Constructed By Two Fabrication Techniques: CAD/CAM And Heat Press (In-Vitro Study)

Article 9, Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2023, Page 63-85  XML PDF (620.27 K)
Document Type: Original research articles
DOI: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.186598.1045
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Weaam Nagy Nagy email orcid 1; Mostafa Hussien Kamalorcid 2; Rana Mahmoud Sheriforcid 3; Lamia Sayed Kheirallaorcid 4
1Post Graduate Researcher, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt
2Lecturer of Fixed Prosthodontics Conservative Dentistry Department, Fixed Prosthodontic Division, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt
3Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
4Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background: Metal-ceramic restorations were considered the gold standard, however, all-ceramic restorations gained popularity owing to their remarkable properties. Purpose: To evaluate the marginal accuracy of IPS e.max and PEEK Bio.HPP monolithic crowns constructed by two fabrication techniques (Heat Press and CAD/CAM). Materials and methods: Twenty monolithic crowns were divided into two equal groups according to the materials used. Group E: Lithium disilicate crowns and Group P: PEEK BioHPP crowns. Each group was further subdivided into two equal subgroups according to the fabrication technique with five crowns per subgroup (n=5). Subgroup H: Heat Press technique and Subgroup C: CAD/CAM technique. A biogeneric copy STL file was generated biogeneric and sent to a 5-axis CAM machine to mill identical IPS e.max, PEEK BioHPP, and wax patterns. IPS e.max and PEEK Bio.HPP crowns were then heat-pressed using the milled wax patterns. The vertical marginal gap (VMG) distance was evaluated for each crown surface at five predetermined equally distributed points using the direct view technique. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the VMG distance between IPS e.max (23.1±2.8μm) and PEEK Bio.HPP (24.4±1.6μm) crowns. Crowns heat-pressed from IPS e.max ingots (23.1±2.8μm) and PEEK Bio.HPP pellets (24.4±1.6μm) showed a lower statistically significant mean VMG distance than the crowns CAD/CAM milled from IPS e.max blocks (29.5±3.2μm) and PEEK Bio.HPP blanks (30.2±1.4μm). Conclusion: IPS e.max and PEEK crowns fabricated using either technique showed clinically acceptable results, meanwhile the heat-pressing technique showed better marginal adaptation when compared to milled crowns.
Keywords
Marginal gap; lithium disilicate; PEEK Bio.HPP; fabrication techniques; fit
Main Subjects
Pharmaceutical, Dental, and medical disciplines whether they are descriptive, analytical, experimental, or basic studies
Statistics
Article View: 514
PDF Download: 751
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.