• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 5 (2025)
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 4 (2024)
Volume Volume 3 (2023)
Volume Volume 2 (2022)
Volume Volume 1 (2021)
ElShazly, R. (2025). Clinical Time of the Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Composite Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Cervical Lesions –A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 5(1), 65-77. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2025.312105.1090
Riham Kamal ElShazly. "Clinical Time of the Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Composite Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Cervical Lesions –A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial". Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 5, 1, 2025, 65-77. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2025.312105.1090
ElShazly, R. (2025). 'Clinical Time of the Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Composite Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Cervical Lesions –A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial', Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 5(1), pp. 65-77. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2025.312105.1090
ElShazly, R. Clinical Time of the Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Composite Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Cervical Lesions –A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 2025; 5(1): 65-77. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2025.312105.1090

Clinical Time of the Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Composite Versus Nanohybrid Composite in Cervical Lesions –A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Article 8, Volume 5, Issue 1, June 2025, Page 65-77  XML PDF (563.65 K)
Document Type: Original research articles
DOI: 10.21608/jfcr.2025.312105.1090
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Riham Kamal ElShazly email orcid
Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral & Dental Medicine, Misr International University (MIU), Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Introduction: Restorative materials have evolved toward simpler, faster applications. Incrementally-layered composite resins, while improved, still face long chair-side issues. Self-adhesive bulk-fill resins offer a solution by allowing thicker layers and reducing procedure time. Aim: To assess the clinical time of the novel material, Surefil One (SuO), against the conventional composite, Neo Spectra (NS), in cervical cavities. Materials and Methods: Fifty-four cervical cavities were prepared and divided into right and left sides in a split-mouth design and one side was filled with SuO and the alternative side receive NS. Operatory time (Minutes) was measured and compared between both materials starting from cavity preparation and terminating after polishing was done utilizing a stop watch. Results: SuO showed lower mean clinical time than NS. Conclusion: Utilizing a material that has both advantages of being self-adhesive and bulk-filled reduces the chairside time. Recommendation: Further long-term clinical studies are warranted to assess the stability and clinical performance of this material.
Keywords
Surefil One; self-adhesive; bulk-fill; nano-hybrid; operatory time
Main Subjects
Pharmaceutical, Dental, and medical disciplines whether they are descriptive, analytical, experimental, or basic studies
Statistics
Article View: 20
PDF Download: 21
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.