• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 4 (2024)
Volume Volume 3 (2023)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 2 (2022)
Volume Volume 1 (2021)
Semary, A., Kamal, M., Katamish, H., Morsy, T. (2023). Accuracy of Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Two Different 3D Printers for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery “An in-Vitro Study”. Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 3(2), 112-124. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.216009.1048
Amr Semary; Mostafa Hussien Kamal; Hesham Katamish; Tarek Salah Morsy. "Accuracy of Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Two Different 3D Printers for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery “An in-Vitro Study”". Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 3, 2, 2023, 112-124. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.216009.1048
Semary, A., Kamal, M., Katamish, H., Morsy, T. (2023). 'Accuracy of Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Two Different 3D Printers for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery “An in-Vitro Study”', Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 3(2), pp. 112-124. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.216009.1048
Semary, A., Kamal, M., Katamish, H., Morsy, T. Accuracy of Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Two Different 3D Printers for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery “An in-Vitro Study”. Journal of Fundamental and Clinical Research, 2023; 3(2): 112-124. doi: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.216009.1048

Accuracy of Surgical Guides Fabricated Using Two Different 3D Printers for Prosthetically Driven Implant Surgery “An in-Vitro Study”

Article 8, Volume 3, Issue 2, December 2023, Page 112-124  XML PDF (599.91 K)
Document Type: Original research articles
DOI: 10.21608/jfcr.2023.216009.1048
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Authors
Amr Semary email orcid 1; Mostafa Hussien Kamalorcid 2; Hesham Katamishorcid 3; Tarek Salah Morsyorcid 4
1Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt
2Lecturer of Fixed Prosthodontics Conservative Dentistry Department, Fixed Prosthodontic Division, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt
3Professor of Fixed Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Egypt
4Professor & Vice Dean of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Background: Prosthetically driven implant surgery provides a higher level of precision in the placement of dental implants and leads to more predictable outcomes in prosthetic results when compared to implant surgery without guidance. Aim: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of implant placement when utilizing surgical guides that are 3D printed through Stereolithography (SLA) and Digital Light Processing (DLP) techniques. Materials and Methods: Eighteen epoxy resin models with a missing mandibular first molar were prepared. The positioning of the implant was planned virtually using 3D planning software. Total of nine surgical guides were manufactured using an SLA 3D printer and another nine guides were manufactured using a DLP 3D printer. Total of 18 dental implants (5.5×11 mm) were placed using tooth supported surgical guides. Dental implants were digitally scanned using scan body and the differences between the planned and placed position of implants in terms of point of entry, apical point and angular deviation were assessed for both groups. For comparison, the Mann-Whitney U test was used (P ≤0.05). Results: Statistically significant difference was observed between SLA and DLP in relation to the deviation at entry point of the implants (P=0.021) and deviation at apical point (P
Keywords
Surgical guides; Prosthetically driven implant; Stereolithography; Digital light processing; 3D printing
Main Subjects
Pharmaceutical, Dental, and medical disciplines whether they are descriptive, analytical, experimental, or basic studies
Statistics
Article View: 221
PDF Download: 764
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.